Skip to main content

Gamespy Reviewer for Lost Odyssey EXPOSED - PART II

In my third world country, we have a saying: "Bato bato sa langit, kung tamaan ay huwag magagalit."

Game reviewers are not gods.

They do not decide the fate of a game in the marketplace. This has been proven time and again with games like Assassin's Creed, Dead Rising, Lost Planet, and now, Lost Odyssey. You can check any major forum right now and you'll find the same thing:

Positive impressions across the board.
Gamers touched emotionally by the game's finest character moments. Appreciation for the strongly TRADITIONAL turn-based JRPG system. Maybe a few comments of frustration on the challenge and difficulty of the game, but I don't see that many Xbox gamers giving up that easily. A lot of the ones who don't surrender right away come off with a sense of complete satisfaction once they've overcome the game's initial baptism of fire: Grilgan and Bogimoray.

Lost Odyssey is here. And it's as massive and epic as it was promised to be.

Now, on the boards, Ramonskito pointed out to me today that apparently, Patrick Joynt from Gamespy just issued his response to accusations that he didn't give Lost Odyssey a fair shake. Apparently our little article, entitled "Gamespy Reviewer for Lost Odyssey EXPOSED" got around the internet and it eventually reached Joynt himself.

It starts on this forum thread here,
where Gamespy forum-goer Gaming4Life links back to our blog's article and to the neogaf post where this all started. Once again I'd like to say that it is to the credit of Sennin from Neogaf forums that this gamespy reviewer was exposed for his ignorance of Lost Odyssey's turn-based gameplay mechanics; I merely found the argument between the two of them and posted it here. I would have joined in that argument had it been possible for me to register on Neogaf. Apparently it's impossible for gamers in the third world to register there...they require an e-mail address that they can recognize and that isn't a 'free' one like a hotmail address or a yahoo address.

And then, a few posts thereafter, Patrick Joynt ("deadairis") joins in the discussion and only had this to post as his response:

Patrick Joynt:
"G4L, you're citing as a source...neogaf? Truly, you are a treasure. Don't you ever leave. "

He's either unaware of how he was gloriously owned by Sennin on neogaf forums, or he's just brushing off the issue, because he's a game journalist. From what he thinks is his position of power, he feels he is invincible. By posting that kind of response, in a way he's disrespecting Neogaf, a forum that he himself visits. Is this the extent of what he thinks of the gamers on Neogaf, or of gamers in general? That we can't be a source of reliable opinion on games, and that only journalists like himself set the standard of what is and isn't a great game?

Why must gamers give these reviewers power over their ability to make informed decisions? The truth is, there are so many other ways to find out if a particular game is worth buying or not. You can read user reviews and forum posts, and in some cases (not in Lost Odyssey's case at the moment) try a game demo and make your buying decision based on that. Game reviews these days are becoming more and more irrelevant, precisely because these game reviewers don't look at the big picture, instead picking out flaws and lowering a numerical score based on that.

Furthermore, game reviewers seem intent on making the presence (or lack thereof) of innovation a major factor in scoring newer game franchises, but never seem to apply the same standard for existing game franchises with larger fanbases (and thus, with larger potential sources of angry e-mails). Games like Mario or Final Fantasy can get away with being similar to past iterations, while newer games like Lost Odyssey can't, even if it executes an existing gameplay methodology extremely well, or better than its counterparts.

Lastly, what's the difference between Patrick Joynt, Sennin, and me and my wife? We are all gamers. We all have a right to our own opinion. But Joynt is paid to do this sort of thing, and we aren't.

Popular posts from this blog

Gamers based in the Philippines: How to get in Xbox Live

NOTE: This article has recently been updated (as of August 12, 2006). Singapore no longer lets you input '00000' as your zip code. Please see below for alternate zip codes.

So you're a Filipino living in the Philippines with a brand-spanking new Xbox 360. You've heard about all the wonderful stories on Xbox Live. You happen to have a pretty good broadband connection. One day, you try out the Xbox Live sign-up options on your 360, and you find out to your dismay that your country is NOT listed. What do you do?

Now, you can probably enjoy your 360 without live at all, but I have to tell you: YOU ARE MISSING OUT. As Peter Moore said in the recent MS Press Conference: "Having your 360 connected to Xbox Live is as vital as having your computer connected to the Internet".

He is so damned right.

I've been playing on Xbox Live for almost a year now (both on my original Xbox and the Xbox 360). Essentially I found out all of this with a little bit of research, a little…

Possible Solution for PS3 NAT TYPE 3 on Globe Telecom PROLINK Modems!

Long time no post...been busy with work but still gaming on the side when I have the time. One thing I have been trying to fix for practically months now is getting NAT TYPE 3 on my Playstation 3 when connected wirelessly via a Linksys WRT120N Router connected to Globe Telecom's PROLINK Modem/Router.

NAT TYPE 2 is the ideal set up to find games online easily and to connect to more players.

I'll probably update this post some time later today to clarify some a rush because I'm also working...

Here was my setup before:

Linksys WRT120N
- Has DHCP Server On
- Getting an IP address from the Globe modem of 192.168.254.x

Prolink Modem from Globe
- Apparently also a router of some kind
- The public/dynamic(?) IP address from Globe was in this device and not in the WRT120N device, as evidenced by an address that was not 192.168.x.x
- Username and password was in the Prolink device.

After reading a LOT of information online, including this one:…

The CD-R King USB Arcade Stick on the Playstation 3 - An Honest (But Not Cynical) Opinion

(*Pictures included below. I also have a picture of the BUTTON CONFIGURATION Screen for Street Fighter IV for the Playstation 3, configured for use with the CDR-King USB Arcade Stick. This will surely be useful for anyone considering to buy the CD-R King USB Arcade Stick. Mapping the buttons on the CD-R King stick can be quite tedious, with the way SFIV is set up for button mapping.)

I spent a (relatively) small amount of money on one of those generic USB Arcade Sticks that they're selling over in CD-R King (the stick cost PHP 550). The thing is, arcade sticks for the Playstation 3 have become extremely rare now that Street Fighter IV is out. Playing on the PS3 controller is workable, but gives me a sore left thumb.

It's one of the hassles of living in an 'unsupported' country that I haven't got any easy access to peripherals for game consoles. Even before SFIV came out, arcade sticks for any console here in the Philippines is extremely rare, and even if they do come…