Skip to main content

David Sirlin Says SFIV Is Too Complex. I Completely Disagree.

http://kotaku.com/5160611/street-fighter-hd-designer-wha-street-fighter-iv-aint-simple

When I read about the 100/100 scores, I see again and again how "simple and elegant" the game is. Two super meters, a 3-tier focus attack system, and all the complications above seem to fly in the face of that. Even more though, I hear how "casual friendly" it is. This is deeply mysterious and I'm not sure why this so often claimed. Not every game has to be casual friendly, so it would seem more honest to just explain how casual unfriendly all these things are. Qcf x 2 +PPP all the time, extra button presses to throw, extra button presses to roman cancel, and many, many extremely difficult link combos work in concert to create that impenetrable wall of execution between you and the actual game (the interaction between you and your opponent). I wish we could get rid of all this stuff and focus more on the gameplay itself.

I read the full article and I completely disagreed with what Sirlin had to say. I've come off playing Virtua Fighter 5 after a long time and going into Street Fighter IV, it seemed far simpler to me than the previous game that I played.

One thing is that I have some degree of experience with older Street Fighter games, so the learning curve for players like myself isn't so high. The question is, does he have a point when it comes to bringing in more casual gamers to the fighting genre?

I think there's a lot more to bringing in more players to fighting games than just giving them a button to push which lets them pull off fireballs instantly. Fighting games are just simply more competitive. Even if you made the controls really easy for new players, I think a lot of them would stop playing at some point. Why? I think it's less to do with the ability to pull off moves easily, and more to do with the psychological effect of winning or losing in a game.

I think I've talked about this in other blog posts previously. In a fighting game, when you LOSE, it's more easy to get discouraged to keep on playing. That's because when you lose, you lose all by yourself, and you've got no one else to blame. For players who get easily affected by losing, all it takes is a continuous streak of losses to completely give up on a game. No amount of move shortcuts is going to change that fact about fighting games. The part where you can actually lose (and feel pretty stupid about it) is something that is just part and parcel of the genre.

Picture this....putting fireballs and dragon punches to each button of your controller won't make everyone like the game more. That's because it won't make them win any easily against other players, who have access to the exact same shortcuts. So what you'll have is a scenario where players who already know the game will have an even EASIER time beating up new players. I don't think it was ever about putting shortcuts for special moves or making ultra/super moves easier.

One thing that made Street Fighter II so popular way back then (in the 90's) was the social aspect of it. Friends of mine would huddle around a machine and talk about how to play the game, and how to get better at it. Paying for each game made it feel like 'gambling' in a way; the better you were at the game, the less money you spent on tokens. So even if you didn't really win any money playing Street Fighter II, at least you didn't spend any more money, and had a damn good time playing it.

With today's gamers, that isn't really the case now. With the Internet making playing online the more convenient option, the real-life social aspect of playing fighting games is a bit lost on people. When you play a fighting game online, you don't have the chance to ask a person how he won or what he did different. The anonymity of the Internet just makes people usually more inclined to trash talk other players or blame lag or other things. In a sense, the fighting game environment today is more brutal on people's ego, there's more of a sense of isolation when you play a fighting game in the online environment.

And I think that's the primary reason why you aren't seeing Street Fighter IV suddenly ursurping Guitar Hero as the game of choice for connected, casual gamers.

By its very nature, fighting games are simply more competitive in feel and scope. Making moves easier is not going to make things any different for the genre. I think it will just introduce a sense of randomness to the game, a sense of 'cheap wins' (winning where you know you just got 'lucky' and you didn't really earn the victory).

I don't think the method for executing special moves in fighting games should be dumbed down. What I DO think, is that fighting games should do MORE to train players to get better. Virtua Fighter 5's Dojo Mode is pretty good, but still not good enough. I had wished that SF4 would have had a similar mode to that game when it comes to training new players. Also, there should be some kind of area in the online mode that's really for new players and meant to demonstrate how or why a player won or lost. Something like that would be more technical to achieve, but it's really the only solution to improve the reception towards fighting games that casual users usually have.

*****

For readers who thought my post was TL;DR, here's a short summary.

Making special moves easier in fighting games is NOT going to suddenly make casual gamers like them. By their very nature, fighting games require far more dedication and training to play because the reward (and punishment) for winning or losing is more brutal. You can only blame yourself when you're not good enough at it.

The only way for fighting games to overcome this and become more popular with gamers is to reintroduce the social aspect this gametype once had, when it was being played by people meeting up in real life in the arcades. Players have to somehow be able to teach and encourage other players to get better....and essentially remind them all that it's just a game, and it's meant to be fun.

Popular posts from this blog

Gamers based in the Philippines: How to get in Xbox Live

NOTE: This article has recently been updated (as of August 12, 2006). Singapore no longer lets you input '00000' as your zip code. Please see below for alternate zip codes.

So you're a Filipino living in the Philippines with a brand-spanking new Xbox 360. You've heard about all the wonderful stories on Xbox Live. You happen to have a pretty good broadband connection. One day, you try out the Xbox Live sign-up options on your 360, and you find out to your dismay that your country is NOT listed. What do you do?

Now, you can probably enjoy your 360 without live at all, but I have to tell you: YOU ARE MISSING OUT. As Peter Moore said in the recent MS Press Conference: "Having your 360 connected to Xbox Live is as vital as having your computer connected to the Internet".

He is so damned right.

I've been playing on Xbox Live for almost a year now (both on my original Xbox and the Xbox 360). Essentially I found out all of this with a little bit of research, a little…

Xbox One - System / Games general review

We picked up a [kinect-less] Xbox One a few weeks ago and have been putting it through its paces. Overall, right now I feel pretty good about this console. But I have to admit, the first experience of buying it is not very good. I'll go with the BAD news first. But do note that it isn't all bad news....

- The first time you bring it home, the console can't work without Internet. That's because it needs an absolutely-unoverrideable mandatory update. Basically, if you get this for your birthday and it's 7PM, expect to actually play games on it around a day or so later, depending on your internet speed.

- The first patch I got for it was around 800MB. This number might have changed by the time of this writing.

- All the launch games now have accumulated patches/updates over 16+ GB in size. Not just Dead Rising 3, which has been reported widely in the media. Even Forza 5.

- My internet at home is PLDT 3Mbps; managed to get all the updates pretty quickly....that's a…

E3 2015 Conferences from the Big Three - My thoughts

Microsoft:

- They get a lot of points from me for actually announcing games that will be out in 2015.
- The Backwards Compatibility update is a huge surprise that I absolutely did not expect. Having BC is difficult and expensive to do, but somehow MS managed to do it, which leads me to believe the solution they found is an inexpensive one if they've decided it's practical to do QA work for the Xbox 360s gigantic library of games and make them all work on the Xbox One. If it was too complicated or expensive they probably wouldn't have bothered. But since they did, I think we're going to see full BC some time soon for all games. It's only a matter of time.
- Halo 5 looked fantastic, but 343 has a lot of work to do to restore faith, after the horrific launch of the Halo Master Chief Collection. I think they can do it, and I'd imagine they're certainly motivated now. If they screw this one up....MS might reconsider forming a new team to handle the Halo franchis…